By Peter De Coensel,


From guided QE to blunt traditional policy and back?

The statement that developed market (DM) central banks staged a volte-face in monetary policy over the past 12 months is not an exaggeration. The question that pops up is weather a frontloaded use of the blunt policy rate instrument will be effective in bringing inflation back towards target over the short-term? The answer is ‘yes’. Base effects, a mild European winter, near fully-adjusted and balanced demand/supply conditions across goods (basic and technology) markets render the outlook promising. US service is inflation is slowing. EU will follow. Across the US and the EU inflation prints will adjust forcefully over the next 6 to 9 months.

One question remains: “Can central banks keep inflation around the targeted level of 2.00% over the long term?” A peculiar shift has taken place since early 2022. A central bank policy based on forward guidance & QE interventionism was abandoned and replaced by a blunt and traditional hiking cycle. Destroying aggregate demand in order to quell inflation was the path forward. Fact is, however, that the inflation acceleration is exogenous in nature and rooted in cost-push channels across energy, food, microchips… On top, global trade channels are concentrated among countries, exacerbating the inflation upshot. So, supply got disrupted… central banks that want to crush demand is a poor policy response as potential collateral damage might be high across production capacity and potential growth.

Over the following 6 months, central banks will play the last innings of respective hiking plays. But let’s repeat, the impact is highly uncertain. Market commentators have mixed assessments on the lags of monetary tightening on labour markets. The masses of retiring baby boomers, an important cohort of people taking a pause (the big resignation) next to a stubborn skill mismatch has led to persistent, tight labour conditions. Yet, a ketchup bottle effect might be in the making: i.e. companies reacting forcefully as redundancy rounds increase in numbers and size across sectors. The labour market dynamic might take a turn for the worse.

Inflation worries are replaced by growth worries. Will emerging market (EM) economies come to the rescue? Deflation headwinds could appear over 2024 and beyond. Moreover, the blunt impact of the current tight financial conditions will damage the energy transition objectives set by DM governments. The increased cost of capital is delaying energy efficiency strategies. It also increases the burden across fiscal policies that become constraints in their support of public investment programs across mobility, green technology and sustainable infrastructure.

We take note of an increased risk for a carbon ‘lock-in’. Initially, sustainable technologies exhibit higher capital intensity than known fossil-based technologies. This risk grows as a polycrisis environment, where current risks (cost of living, natural disasters, geoeconomics confrontation…) intersect with emerging crises (failure to mitigate & adapt to climate change, large-scale involuntary migration…), is conducive to allowing ‘old and known ways of production and consumption’ to prevail.

In their paper ‘Beyond normal central banking? Monetary policy after the pandemic’ (Working Paper 2022.19 European Trade Union Institute), two researchers at the Ghent University – Hielke Van Doorslaer and Mattias Vermeiren – eloquently conclude that the ECB and the FED should step away from damaging the overall productive capacity by indiscriminately raising policy rate in order to anchor inflation expectations. Instead, the authors call for credit guidance providing targeted and preferential funding treatment (through the banking channel) to corporate and government initiatives, projects that support the green transition.

Effectively, it’s kind of odd to see how the ECB for example steered away from a set of highly interventionist and targeted policies impacting the banking sector (TLTRO), the corporate sector (CSPP) and the public sector (PSPP). ECB (and FED) inflation fighting credibility is not at risk as we observe normalised, on target, market-based longer-term inflation expectations. Why push the envelope and risk recessionary conditions that might persist in a polycrisis ecosystem?

Central banking maintains an aura of mystic. Yet, the trial-and-error approach witnessed over the past three years bears attention. As the reaction to the outbreak of the pandemic was outsized, clearly the current policy rate tightening zeal might also be outsized. Watch out before we break something.


Degroof Petercam Asset Management SA/NV l rue Guimard 18, 1040 Brussels, Belgium l RPM/RPR Brussels l TVA BE 0886 223 276 l

© Degroof Petercam Asset Management SA/NV, 2022, all rights reserved. This document may not be distributed to retail investors and its use is exclusively restricted to professional investors. This document may not be reproduced, duplicated, disseminated, stored in an automated data file, disclosed, in whole or in part or distributed to other persons, in any form or by any means whatsoever, without the prior written consent of Degroof Petercam Asset Management (“DPAM”). Having access to this document does not transfer the proprietary rights whatsoever nor does it transfer title and ownership rights. The information in this document, the rights therein and legal protections with respect thereto remain exclusively with DPAM. 

DPAM is the author of the present document. Although this document and its content were prepared with due care and are based on sources and/or third party data providers which DPAM deems reliable, they are provided ‘as is’ without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither DPAM nor it sources and third party data providers guarantee the correctness, the completeness, reliability, timeliness, availability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose.  

The provided information herein must be considered as having a general nature and does not, under any circumstances, intend to be tailored to your personal situation. Its content does not represent investment advice, nor does it constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation or invitation to buy, sell, subscribe to or execute any other transaction with financial instruments including but not limited to shares, bonds and units in collective investment undertakings. This document is not aimed to investors from a jurisdiction where such an offer, solicitation, recommendation or invitation would be illegal.

Neither does this document constitute independent or objective investment research or financial analysis or other form of general recommendation on transaction in financial instruments as referred to under Article 2, 2°, 5 of the law of 25 October 2016 relating to the access to the provision of investment services and the status and supervision of portfolio management companies and investment advisors. The information herein should thus not be considered as independent or objective investment research.

Investing incurs risks. Past performances do not guarantee future results. All opinions and financial estimates in this document are a reflection of the situation at issuance and are subject to amendments without notice. Changed market circumstance may render the opinions and statements in this document incorrect.


Your name

Your e-mail

Name receiver

E-mail address receiver

Your message