By Sam Vereecke,
Fixed Income CIO at DPAM

& Lowie Debou,
Fixed Income Fund Manager at DPAM


    • The sum of financial tightening matters. As the tightening of the credit channel has increased following the recent bank shock, interest rate tightening should be lower than previously anticipated. This does not mean the ECB and other central banks will stop hiking, but we are closer to the peak.
    • We were already gradually closing our underweight duration stance. Recent events might speed up this process, although the repricing in bond markets was very fast.
    • As we are closer to the ECB’s terminal policy rate, curves should continue steepening.


Over the past week, for the first time since central banks started tightening monetary policy, we have seen a clear and abrupt shock to financial markets. Previously we had been discussing that, so far, we had only seen limited effects of the tightening cycle on the real economy. Consumer spending remains healthy, and corporates very profitable.

Now, the main question is whether the US regional bank issues (that have so far been very idiosyncratic and a failure of both regulation and business models) and the credit Suisse troubles will lead to a global contagion of financial institutions. This would cause the developed market central banks to stop the hiking cycle earlier than expected or even reverse course on monetary policy.

So far, we believe this not to be the base case. But the probability that we have reached the highs in policy rates has now significantly increased.

Currently, as it is the case for Credit Suisse, it is about markets chasing the weakest link. This clearly has safe haven effects on Bunds and Treasuries. The fear of financial contagion and a repeat of the GFC and a new sovereign debt crisis in Europe are strongly pushing rates down. This is re-enforced by an anticipation of a U-turn in monetary policy.

Over a short horizon this implies the following risks:

1. Is a peripheral bank next in line? That would mean peripheral spreads idiosyncratically move up compared to the safe-havens. We think it is very unlikely, as CS seems idiosyncratic, and regulators are aware that confidence in the financial system has to remain intact. This has been confirmed in the additional press releases by the ECB and the Fed. In case the risk of contagion increases, they will take clear and strong action. During the ECB meeting on 16 March, it was confirmed that the TPI will indeed be used if this would be required to counter “unwarranted, disorderly market dynamics that pose a serious threat to the transmission of monetary policy”. Again, the unconditionality and unlimited purchasing power of this tool has high credibility. This was illustrated when the recent increase in rates was not met with increasing spreads in the European periphery.

2. Would this significantly alter the ECB’s course? We think not, even though that macroprudential supervision could affect monetary policy as in the end financial stability is a secondary mandate. Lagarde clearly stated that the decision to hike 50bps is very sensible from an inflation-fighting perspective, but that financial stability needs to be carefully calibrated with their primary objective. It was one of her best speeches proven by extremely calm markets during the press conference. She highlighted the need for calibration of monetary policy and financial stability making the future path of monetary policy even more data-dependent and that they would not hesitate to use the current toolkit or create new tools that could specifically target financial stability concerns. In addition, the Bank of England has shown that monetary policy can stay the course even when the balance sheet needs to be used to temporarily address a problem. But it should be stressed that a banking shock further increases the transmission of monetary policy through the credit channel. Banks become more cautious in granting credit, both in terms of size and lending standards, thereby substituting to a certain extent the need to hike the monetary policy interest rate.

But over the medium term the required monetary policy stance is not yet fully clear as inflationary pressures are not decreasing as quickly as hoped. Moreover, even though energy prices are strongly decreasing, the stickiness of core inflation is worrisome. Even if monetary policy transmission is happening especially through the credit channel, the pace of transmission might be too slow. Especially taking into account the uncertainty regarding lead-lags of monetary policy has increased, but they are more important than ever.

Even before this recent market event, it was clear that we were getting close to levels where it was appropriate to close the remaining duration underweight in our strategies, as we were getting close to the peak of monetary policy tightening. After the current events, it is likely more effects of the tightening cycle will become visible, requiring the ECB to at least slow down monetary policy tightening, even if the inflation situation is not fully in line with the target. Better safe (i.e. waiting for monetary policy to fully work through) than sorry (i.e. increasing the probability for a policy mistake and potentially having to ease more than you tightened) will become the mantra of central banks once again.


Degroof Petercam Asset Management SA/NV l rue Guimard 18, 1040 Brussels, Belgium l RPM/RPR Brussels l TVA BE 0886 223 276 l

Marketing communication. Investing incurs risks. Past performances do not guarantee future results.

Degroof Petercam Asset Management SA/NV, 2022, all rights reserved. This document may not be distributed to retail investors and its use is exclusively restricted to professional investors. This document may not be reproduced, duplicated, disseminated, stored in an automated data file, disclosed, in whole or in part or distributed to other persons, in any form or by any means whatsoever, without the prior written consent of Degroof Petercam Asset Management (DPAM). Having access to this document does not transfer the proprietary rights whatsoever nor does it transfer title and ownership rights. The information in this document, the rights therein and legal protections with respect thereto remain exclusively with DPAM.

DPAM is the author of the present document. Although this document and its content were prepared with due care and are based on sources and/or third party data providers which DPAM deems reliable, they are provided without any warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither DPAM nor it sources and third party data providers guarantee the correctness, the completeness, reliability, timeliness, availability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose.

The provided information herein must be considered as having a general nature and does not, under any circumstances, intend to be tailored to your personal situation. Its content does not represent investment advice, nor does it constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation or invitation to buy, sell, subscribe to or execute any other transaction with financial instruments including but not limited to shares, bonds and units in collective investment undertakings. This document is not aimed to investors from a jurisdiction where such an offer, solicitation, recommendation or invitation would be illegal.

Neither does this document constitute independent or objective investment research or financial analysis or other form of general recommendation on transaction in financial instruments as referred to under Article 2, 2°, 5 of the law of 25 October 2016 relating to the access to the provision of investment services and the status and supervision of portfolio management companies and investment advisors. The information herein should thus not be considered as independent or objective investment research.

Investing incurs risks. Past performances do not guarantee future results. All opinions and financial estimates in this document are a reflection of the situation at issuance and are subject to amendments without notice. Changed market circumstance may render the opinions and statements in this document incorrect.


Your name

Your e-mail

Name receiver

E-mail address receiver

Your message