Before visiting this website, you should confirm that you are a qualified investor within the meaning of the Prospectus Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of 14 June 2017.
You should make sure that the rules you are subject to allow you to subscribe to shares and/or units of the Collective Investment Schemes (“CIS”) mentioned on this website. Certain rules (including rules on public offering and/or marketing of CIS) may, depending on the country where the CIS are marketed, impact the marketing options for CIS and restrict the marketing thereof to certain types of investors.
I hereby acknowledge that I am aware of the rules applicable to me and I wish to access this website.
By accessing this website, I confirm that I have read and approved the legal notice
"Legal Information and Website Terms and Conditions of Use".
by Matthew Welch,
Responsible Investment Specialist at DPAM
The ESG debt market has continued to grow rapidly. 2020 was a stellar year for the ESG debt financing with a growth of 29%. As seen in the graph below, a significant element that facilitated this strong increase can be found in the boost in social bonds. This increase clearly coincided with the widespread expansion of the COVID-19 virus and the related social problems that this virus brought forth, ranging from health & safety issues to an increase in unemployment figures. Nonetheless green bonds still are the largest driver of the current labelled bond market.
Apart from green bonds, what other instruments can be found in the ESG debt market? Sustainability-linked bonds are an example of a newly emerging type of issuance. They have been introduced to the market in 2019 by the utilities company Enel and have gained rapid traction among sustainable investors, poised to increase further. This new type of issuance should not be confused with sustainability bonds, which intentionally mix green and social projects and work with the same mechanism as social or green bonds.
GREEN BONDS: THE MAIN DRIVERS OF THE LABELLED BOND MARKET
Green bonds can be categorized as activity-based debt instrument, i.e. the proceeds of the bonds are dedicated to clearly delineated projects. This activity-based instrument enables investors to clearly understand how the financing will be allocated towards -in the case of green bonds- solutions to environmental problems such as climate change or biodiversity loss.
The stringent guidelines set up by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the so-called Green Bond Principles, ensure maximum transparency towards investors. These principles detail the use of proceeds of the bond, how projects are evaluated and selected in the context of the green bond, how the proceeds are managed and finally the reporting on both the allocation of proceeds and the generated impact.
The long track record of green bonds has clearly shown the added value of this type of instruments to move capital towards projects that generate a positive environmental impact. Nonetheless, the core characteristic of the instrument also faces a small disadvantage.
Due to using a ‘use-of-proceeds’ based approach, the financial and utility sectors are overrepresented in the corporate issuers of these type of bonds. These two sectors often work on a project basis, with project portfolios that are more logically linked to clear sustainability goals and thus easily financed through activity-based instruments.
The figure below represents sustainability corporate bond offerings as from 2013 and demonstrates this bias toward financials and utilities. This subsequently translates to a select type of projects being financed, specifically in the fields of renewable energy and sustainable housing.
Recently we have seen an increased diversification in green bond issuance across sectors, but the sector concentration is still present, and we need a transition in all sectors to face the environmental challenges.
Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research
Now it seems that a new financing instrument, sustainability-linked bonds, is an answer to the sectorial bias characterized by the green bond market.
The ICMA describes sustainability-linked bonds (“SLBs”) as any type of bond instrument for which the financial and/or structural characteristics can vary depending on whether the issuer achieves predefined ESG objectives. The variable characteristic of the bond is often featuring a step up in coupon rates if the issuer does not reach predefined sustainability targets. The concept is a forward-looking, performance-based instrument, and therefore, in contrast with the green bonds, they can be categorized as a behaviour-based instrument. An instrument where the investor does not know where the funds will be invested but can have a moderate assurance on the impact that the company will generate through predefined sustainable target(s). Letting go of project-based restrictions, enable a wider array of issuers to use this instrument.
It is important to highlight that unlike green and social bonds there is no “earmarking” on the use of proceeds of the bond with specific environmental or social projects. The issuer has full discretion over the use of proceeds. This additional flexibility is both a blessing (broader universe) and a curse (more potential for greenwashing).
Figures of April in the figure below, demonstrate this diversification in corporate issuers thanks to the introduction of sustainability-linked bonds.
Corporate ESG-Labeled Debt by Sector ($bn)
In order to standardize the set-up of this instrument, ICMA also developed voluntary process guidelines for corporates considering a SLB issuance. These principles consist of five core components:
The selection of relevant KPI’s and targets might be easier for companies exposed to climate-related themes, such as decarbonisation, where clear-cut processes and targets have been defined to calculate the scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. For companies facing more social material ESG issues, this set-up of relevant KPI’s and targets might prove more challenging, but not insurmountable.
Given the additional flexibility of these types of instruments and the uncertainty investors face on the proceeds of the bond, investors must thoroughly analyse every issuance in order to prevent sustainability-washing.
SURGE IN SOCIAL BONDS AS FROM 2020
A last type of labelled bond to discuss is the social bond. This activity-based debt instrument has a focus on projects with a social impact when it comes to its use of proceeds. Besides this different scope, it can best be compared to the mechanism of green bonds. The surge of this type of instrument, which tripled issuances in 2020 compared to the year prior to a staggering amount of $150 billion, can be associated with the Covid-19 pandemic.
Many players, mainly government agencies, sovereign bodies, and supranational entities use this financing instrument to counterbalance the negative social consequences caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The proceeds of these bonds are consequently allocated projects to alleviate unemployment figures, increase the access to social housing or expand the access to health services.
Social bond issuances are also flourishing in 2021, with the current issuances nearly matching last year’s figure already! We are confident that this trend will continue to persist and hope that the issuance by corporates (which only represent 17% of market issuances in 2021) will gain traction.
NEED FOR QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS
Thanks to the environmental focus of Biden’s infrastructure plan, the rollout of environmental initiatives from the European Union and the proliferation of net-zero emissions goals announced by governments and companies around the world, sustainable bonds issuances will only go up. There will be an increased level of quality assurance thanks to upcoming regulations, such as the recently published green bond standards by the European Commission. On the other hand, asset managers will have an additional level of scrutiny by investors to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the sustainability challenges of issuers when investing in sustainability-linked bonds.